Universal Media Server | Forum

Yeah I'm not sure what would be the best way to do it. A good thing about storing it in memory is faster fetching, but considering the problems Java seems to have with freeing memory it might be nice to limit memory use when we can. So there are good points for either way. I would be happy with eith...

Yep I think you're right that's the way to do it

It's in the 3.0a1 announcement in the Upgrade Notes section

These enhancements aren't in 3.0a1, a2 should be released soon

Errors are expected if you rollback from 3.x to 2.x without a clean install

Well we already kindof do it with the way we allow users to have their own cover images, so we check for an image with the same name as the video. I guess all we need to do is to make UMS save the thumbnails it generates instead of storing them in memory (is that what we do now? I have no idea), and...

It's probably that the transcoding quality is too high for your network. I recommend trying the 3.0-a1 release and running the wizard, that will set some good settings for you automatically that might help

That's only if the file cache is enabled. The feature I want to add would cache the thumbnails even without the cache enabled. I think the ability to run without a file cache is one of the big things that makes us better than other programs and we can make that even faster by caching the thumbnails.

General: You can download it from the front page. This fixes compatibility with the latest Java update, updates translations and networking stability. Changes since 2.6.4: General: Made sure it is possible to override thumbnails Fixed RAW image transcoding and support 28 additional RAW file extensi...

What happens exactly?