Not one of these which are included in the renderer profiles:
Apple-TV-VLC.conf
Apple-TV-4K-VLC.conf
Edit: Just saw that you found it.
Search found 343 matches
- Tue Jun 13, 2023 3:38 pm
- Forum: Media Renderers
- Topic: AppleTV Renderer -- Where is it?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8341
- Sat Jun 10, 2023 2:16 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: INFO Exception in thread "pool-7-thread-29" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8276
Re: INFO Exception in thread "pool-7-thread-29" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Yes, it has been an ongoing problem with UMS for years. Basically, Java is running out of heap space. If you are leaving UMS running 24/7 (like me), it can happen. You can increase the heap space allocation in your Java config although this will not fix the issue but let UMS run longer before it hap...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:50 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: [Solved] UMS don't appearing on any devices
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4582
Re: UMS don't appearing on any devices
The Tp-Link EX220 should NOT be setup as a router. This device actually has an access point mode and that is how it should be setup. The problem is usually when you have 2 routers on 2 different subnets (not a good idea), is that the devices on both routers normally get internet access but the devic...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:55 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: [Solved] UMS don't appearing on any devices
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4582
Re: UMS don't appearing on any devices
The ISP's router is the: Technicolor TC3102?
And all you have connected to that is the TP-Link SG1005D switch?
You have no other routers or wireless access points there?
And all you have connected to that is the TP-Link SG1005D switch?
You have no other routers or wireless access points there?
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:15 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: [Solved] UMS don't appearing on any devices
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4582
Re: UMS don't appearing on any devices
It sounds like when the internet provider installed the new router, it was set on a different IP range than the original router. EG: Original routers LAN IP was 192.168.0.1 and the new routers LAN IP was 192.168.1.1 The other routers/wireless access points could have been in the 192.168.0.x range. D...
- Sun Jun 04, 2023 2:03 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: [Solved] UMS don't appearing on any devices
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4582
Re: UMS don't appearing on any devices
It sounds to me like the "internet switch", which everything is connected to except the PC could be a wireless router which is setup as a router on a different subnet than the router which the desktop is connected to. Further information about the hardware could help solve the issue. Which...
- Fri Mar 31, 2023 2:57 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: [Tracked] Start with Windows & delayed folder mapping doesn't work
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4489
Re: Start with Windows & delayed folder mapping doesn't work
You could delay the start of UMS so it loads after your mapping scripts.
This would not be done in UMS but in windows.
This would not be done in UMS but in windows.
- Tue Mar 21, 2023 4:21 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Server behind NAT?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1546
Re: Server behind NAT?
Another thought. I have a similar situation with my ISP and their router (fiber connection). I had the ISP put their router in bridged mode (so it is just operating like a modem) and then everything else (routing, port forwarding etc), is done by my own router. Perhaps your ISP would be willing to d...
- Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:46 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: UMS Program Starter
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8858
Re: UMS Program Starter
I think it is possible but the first hurdle would be to access the startup file from Windows.
Most likely you would need to have samba running on your Linux server and setup a share.
Most likely you would need to have samba running on your Linux server and setup a share.
- Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:27 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Server behind NAT?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1546
Re: Server behind NAT?
Is there a reason why you cannot have the "internet router" performing DHCP services and have the other 2 routers connected to the "internet router" with fixed IP's (on the same subnet) and have DHCP turned off on these other 2 routers. EG: 192.168.0.1 - Internet router with DHCP...