Server settings example from other software
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:14 pm
Here is a small screenshot of the Encoder settings from LXiMediaCenter.

This is what we mean for user-friendlyness. The only settings I need to watch movies are there, in a single frame set. Video size, quality, and subtitle sizes. How complex could it be to design this?
Also, and this is very important: This program starts serving videos in less than 5 seconds via WiFi. This is totally unthinkable with UMS, which normally takes 20-30 seconds to start playing the video. Also, the video encoding settings in UMS are unusually complex: For example, the fact that I have to manually TYPE a resolution (!!) instead of selecting it from a list of presets is bizarre to say the least.
Last: please remove or hide useless stuff. Why on earth I am presented so many encoders, that are not even installed, and only when I get into this forums I found that the default one is not the better one? I've been told to switch from MEncoder to FFMpeg, the question is, why do you expect every single user to come here and ask the same questions instead of launching a new version with a warning message like "Please switch to the FFMpeg encoder for best performance"? If you say that "one every 1000 users get better results with the MEncoder", then leave the problems to those users, and focus in helping the mainstream of users that should use FFMpeg.
Unfortunately, I am having serious subtitle issues with the LXiMediaCenter, so I still don't decide which software to use. Anyway, if you don't need subtites, check it out just to compare the results, it's also free and open source or whatever. Its GUI is quite basic and primitive, yet a thousand times easier and quicker to set up, and much faster in all aspects.

This is what we mean for user-friendlyness. The only settings I need to watch movies are there, in a single frame set. Video size, quality, and subtitle sizes. How complex could it be to design this?
Also, and this is very important: This program starts serving videos in less than 5 seconds via WiFi. This is totally unthinkable with UMS, which normally takes 20-30 seconds to start playing the video. Also, the video encoding settings in UMS are unusually complex: For example, the fact that I have to manually TYPE a resolution (!!) instead of selecting it from a list of presets is bizarre to say the least.
Last: please remove or hide useless stuff. Why on earth I am presented so many encoders, that are not even installed, and only when I get into this forums I found that the default one is not the better one? I've been told to switch from MEncoder to FFMpeg, the question is, why do you expect every single user to come here and ask the same questions instead of launching a new version with a warning message like "Please switch to the FFMpeg encoder for best performance"? If you say that "one every 1000 users get better results with the MEncoder", then leave the problems to those users, and focus in helping the mainstream of users that should use FFMpeg.
Unfortunately, I am having serious subtitle issues with the LXiMediaCenter, so I still don't decide which software to use. Anyway, if you don't need subtites, check it out just to compare the results, it's also free and open source or whatever. Its GUI is quite basic and primitive, yet a thousand times easier and quicker to set up, and much faster in all aspects.