Re: directory listing is slow
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:29 am
Well he recently did a poll and asked what renderers people were using. The majority said they were using this on PS3. That's why I say I'm surprised. Besides it's not like PS3 is expensive anymore (especially because PS4 is due out this year). It makes an excellent cost-efficient media center (compared to building an HTPC) and plus you get the bonus of it having a huge library of games available as well.
2. Niether are TV's and other renderers, but people have those.
3. PS3 since it's cheap enough now and makes an excellent HTPC when using UMS. I also hear Rasberry PI is excellent as well and it's even cheaper than PS3 (but it takes a bit of work to get one of these setup and it's more for advanced users).
4. Yes, I know what the U means in UMS. Just because other renderers "work" with it doesn't mean they'll run it as well as a PS3.
1. I'm unsure why that's funny.squadjot wrote: 1. LOL
2. Aren't "using PS3" ..PS3 aint free you know.. and if they had free access to PS3's, they might just stick to "PS3 Media Server"
3. You are "surprised"?, what alternative would you suggest worldwide, subtitle craving, generic DLNA users?.. (i know what i'd suggest to them;))
4. "Universal" with a mofo'ing capital U, ..that means..UMS is, and will be (read; strives to be) the best DLNA server for ALL devices. (correct me if i'm wrong)
So.. Olill.. stay tune..Subjunk & Co will fix this.
2. Niether are TV's and other renderers, but people have those.

3. PS3 since it's cheap enough now and makes an excellent HTPC when using UMS. I also hear Rasberry PI is excellent as well and it's even cheaper than PS3 (but it takes a bit of work to get one of these setup and it's more for advanced users).
4. Yes, I know what the U means in UMS. Just because other renderers "work" with it doesn't mean they'll run it as well as a PS3.